(1 January 1919 – 3 March 1919)

Statements of the Emir Feisal, Leader of the Arab Delegation at the Peace Conference, Paris France to Felix Frankfurter and Chaim Weizmann, supporting and agreeing to cooperate with the Zionists for the establishment of a Jewish Palestine. In 1939, Great Britain reaffirms in a detailed report that Palestine was not be included in the land that was offered to Sharif Hussein of Mecca, Feisal’s father, in British correspondences with him during World War I. 

Source: Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives, Seventy-Eighth Congress, Second Session, February 1944, pp. 42-44 and in George Antonius, The Arab Awakening. New York: Capricorn Books, 1965. 437-39. Print.

Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and Emir Feisal, the third son of Hashemite leader Sherif Hussein of Mecca, signed an agreement about  the post-World War I disposition of Palestine. It was signed in London on January 3, 1919, for consideration by the forthcoming Paris Peace Conference. The agreement was brief moment of recognition  between a Jewish and Arab leader that was never ratified by any government nor in any international treaty. Feisal repudiated it because his family’s objective for establishing an Arab state after WWI because the British and French carved up the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire into mandates/trusteeships. 

After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, as part of London’s broader policy of enhancing their geo-strategic interests in the Middle East from Egypt to the Persian Gulf by aligning with local rulers, the British in spring 1918 had brought together Weizmann and Feisal to find some accommodation.  London knew that their respective authorities were questionable. Weizmann was the president of the British Zionist Federation but did not take on the leadership of the World Zionist Organization until 1920, a position he held until 1931. Feisal, the future king of Iraq, had only his word that he was acting on behalf of his father, the sharif of Mecca, Hussein ibn Ali.

Still, their agreement envisioned coexistence between Jews and Arabs in Palestine. Crucially, Weizmann and Feisal presented Palestine as a separate entity from the rest of the formerly Ottoman-controlled Arab world, with exact borders to be determined.  Weizmann and Feisal endorsed the Balfour Declaration, which Weizmann had lobbied for intensively. Both men were more precise than the Balfour Declaration in guaranteeing full rights for all residents, regardless of religion, endorsing Zionist immigration and urging protection of Arab peasants.

Feisal and Weizmann called for Muslims to control Muslim holy sites and foresaw that Zionism would assist the economic development of the Arabs, which the Zionists ended up doing to a considerable extent by economic development in Palestine.  Notably, Feisal added a handwritten note in Arabic that made the agreement contingent on the international community adopting his proposals for his family’s control of Arab lands. His hopes were immediately dashed. Yet, the British sought to reward his Hashemite family with control of some Arab lands because they had fully assisted the British army in in defeating the Ottoman Turkish military in Palestine and Syria in WWI. The British made no such offering to any Arab leader living in Palestine, in part because Palestinian leadership identity had yet to be defined.  Britain and France agreed in the 1920 San Remo Agreement that they would control the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire after WWI. In 1922, at the League of Nations, the French and British agreed on the new political borders of the post war Middle East. These were trusteeships or Mandates where the British secured their administration and control over Palestine, Jordan and Iraq, while the French did the same for Syria and Lebanon.

Looking back, the Feisal-Weizmann Agreement reflected the hopes for future civility between Jews and Arabs.  With considerable resentment, Feisal and his family’s unrealistic expectations were not met with an Arab state’s formation. Instead, his father Sherif Husayn became the leader of Transjordan and he immediately passed that rule in 1921 to his son, Abdullah who ruled Jordan until 1951.Also in 1921, Emir Feisal became King of Iraq until his death in 1933. After playing an instrumental role in securing the Balfour Declaration, Weizmann became President of the World Zionist Organization from 1920 – 1931.  

Michael Jacobs and Ken Stein, April 15, 2025

Chaim Weizmann and Emir Feisal Agreement and Statements

(1 January 1919 – 3 March 1919)

Emir Feisal’s Memorandum to Peace Conference

In a memorandum circulated to the delegates of the Peace Conference under date January 1st, 1919, the Emir Feisal set forth the Arab claims. After describing the national aspirations of the Arabs and claiming independence for the Arabic-speaking countries generally, the memorandum proceeds as follows:

“In Palestine, the enormous majority of the people are Arabs. The Jews are very close to the Arabs in blood, and there is no conflict of character between the two races. Nevertheless, the Arabs cannot assume the responsibility of holding level the scales in the clash of races and religions that have in this one province, so often involved the world in difficulties. They would wish for the effective super-position of a great trustee, so long as a representative local administration commended itself by actively promoting the material prosperity of the country.” 

Emir Feisal’s Statement Before the Council of Five

On February 6th, 1919, the Arab case was laid before the Council of Five by the Emir Feisal as the head of the Hedjaz Delegation comprising, in addition to himself, Colonel Lawrence, Rustum Haidar, Nuri Said and Auni Bey Abdul Hadi. In the official note of the meeting the Emir is reported to have referred to Palestine as follows:

“Palestine, for its universal character he left on one side for the mutual consideration of all parties interested. With this exception, he asked for the independence of the Arabic areas enumerated in his memorandum.”

Letter of Emir Feisal to Professor Frankfurter

Delegation Hedjazienne

Paris, March  3, 1919

Dear Mr. Frankfurter: I want to take this opportunity of my first contact with American Zionists to tell you what I have often been able to say to Dr. Weizmann in Arabia and Europe. 

We feel that the Arabs and Jews are cousins in race, having suffered similar oppressions at the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by a happy coincidence have been able to take the first step towards the attainment of their national ideals together.

We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement. Our deputation here in Paris is fully acquainted with the proposals submitted yesterday by the Zionist Organization to the Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate and proper. We will do our best, in so far as we are concerned, to help them through, we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home.

With the chiefs of your movement, especially with Dr. Weizmann, we have had and continue to have the closest relations. He has been a great helper of our cause, and I hope the Arabs may soon be in a position to make the Jews some return for their kindness. We are working together for a reformed and revived Near East, and our two movements complete one another. The Jewish movement is national and not imperialist. Our movement is national and not imperialist, and there is room in Syria for us both. Indeed I think that neither can be a real success without the other.

People less informed and less responsible than our leaders and yours, ignoring the need for cooperation of the Arabs and Zionists have been trying to exploit the local difficulties that must necessarily arise in Palestine in the early stages of our movements. Some of them have, I am afraid, misrepresented your aims to the Arab peasantry, and our aims to the Jewish peasantry, with the result that interested parties have been able to make capital out of what they call our differences.

I wish to give you my firm conviction that these differences are not on questions of principle, but on matters of detail such as must inevitably occur in every contact of neighboring peoples, and as are easily adjusted by mutual goodwill. Indeed nearly all of them will disappear with fuller knowledge.

I look forward, and my people with me look forward, to a future in which we will help you and you will help us, so that the countries in which we are mutually interested may once again take their places in the community of civilized peoples of the world.

Believe me, Yours sincerely,(Sgd.) FEISAL.

Agreement Between Emir Feisal and Dr. Weizmann

His Royal Highness the Emir Feisal, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of Hedjaz, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization, mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people, and realizing that the surest means of working out the consummation of their national aspirations is through the closest possible collaboration in the development of the Arab State and Palestine, and being desirous further of confirming the good understanding which exists between them have agreed upon the following Articles:

Article I. The Arab State and Palestine in all their relations and undertakings shall be controlled by the most cordial goodwill and understanding, and to this end Arab and Jewish duly accredited agents shall be established and maintained in the respective territories.

Article II. Immediately following the completion of the deliberations of the Peace Conference, the definite boundaries between the Arab State and Palestine shall be determined by a Commission to be agreed upon by the parties hereto.

Article III. In the establishment of the Constitution and Administration of Palestine all such measures shall be adopted as will afford the fullest guarantees for carrying into effect the British Government’s Declaration of the 2nd of November 1917.

Article IV. All necessary measures shall be taken to encourage and stimulate immigration of Jews into Palestine on a large scale, and as quickly as possible to settle Jewish immigrants upon the land through closer settlement and intensive cultivation of the soil. In taking such measures the Arab peasant and tenant farmers shall be protected in their rights and shall be assisted in forwarding their economic development.

Article V. No regulation nor law shall be made prohibiting or interfering in any way with the free exercise of religion; and further the free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship without discrimination or preference shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall ever be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.

Article VI. The Mohammedan Holy Places shall be under Mohammedan control.

Article VII. The Zionist Organization proposes to send to Palestine a Commission of experts to make a survey of the economic possibilities of the country, and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will place the aforementioned Commission at the disposal of the Arab State for the purpose of a survey of the economic possibilities of the Arab State and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will use its best efforts to assist the Arab State in providing the means for developing the natural resources and economic possibilities thereof.

Article VIII. The parties hereto agree to act in complete accord and harmony on all matters embraced herein before the Peace Congress.

Article IX. Any matters of dispute which may arise between the contracting parties shall be referred to the British Government for arbitration.

Given under our hand at London, England, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and nineteen. Chaim Weizmann; Feisal Ibn Hussein

Reservation by the Emir Feisal

If the Arabs are established as I have asked in my manifesto of 4 January addressed to the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, I will carry out what is written in this agreement. If changes are made, I cannot be answerable for failing to carry out this agreement.