Cards List
FILTERED BY:
<span class="cie-plus-title">Ken Stein, “The U.S. Role in Palestinian Self-Determination”</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

Ken Stein, “The U.S. Role in Palestinian Self-Determination”CIE+

Many in the Arab world and amongst Palestinian leaders believe that, for the sake of evenhandedness and justice, the U.S. government, a longtime supporter of Israel’s security and existence, should have openly endorsed and urged others to vote for the proposition of Palestinian state recognition at the United Nations. Criticism of the U.S. failing to do so has been harsh, but it is also without perspective or historical context. What is forgotten is the persistent, even aggressive, perhaps unprecedented role that Washington has played in pushing for Palestinian rights, self-determination and, most recently, for Palestinian statehood.

<span class="cie-plus-title">Annapolis: Precedents and Transactions but Not Transformations</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

Annapolis: Precedents and Transactions but Not TransformationsCIE+

Since the June 1967 war, more than two dozen mediators have engaged in Arab‐ Israeli diplomacy seeking to clarify one underlying question: under what conditions and over what period of time would Israel relinquish land attained in the June 1967 War, and what kind of understanding or agreement from an Arab partner would Israel receive in return? The Annapolis Conference in 2007, was again a Transaction but not a Transformation of Outcomes.

<span class="cie-plus-title">The Quest for Arab-Israeli Peace</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

The Quest for Arab-Israeli PeaceCIE+

“The Quest for Arab-Israeli Peace: Israel’s Disengagement from the Gaza Strip: Precedents, Motivations and Outcomes” Zionism Fulfilled.- Israel’s preemptive physical disengagement from the Gaza Strip in August 2005 was the result of a national consensus;…

Issues and Analyses, Ken's Blog|February 19, 2005
<span class="cie-plus-title">Kenneth Stein, “Separate Palestinians, Israelis Through a Trusteeship,” Orlando Sentinel, 2002</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

Kenneth Stein, “Separate Palestinians, Israelis Through a Trusteeship,” Orlando Sentinel, 2002CIE+

Note by the author: As a faculty member at Emory University, I wrote several articles per month for national and local newspapers. This article appeared in October 2002 in the Orlando Sentinel. The idea for a trusteeship to be possibly be considered to manage the Israeli-Palestinian relationship emerged from my decades of study of the Palestine Mandate, understanding the concept of separation of the two communities that was offered by the British on more than one occasion during the 1930s and 1940s, and the American suggestion in early 1948 to create a trusteeship for Palestine’s future. Martin Indyk, a US diplomat published an article about considering a trusteeship as a future political option in a Foreign Policy magazine article in July 2003.

<span class="cie-plus-title">A Zionist State in 1939</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

A Zionist State in 1939CIE+

“A Zionist State in 1939,” Dr. Kenneth W. Stein, CHAI (Atlanta), Winter 2002 “Had not the Nazi crimes been committed against Jews during World War II, the Jewish State would have never come true.” So…

<span class="cie-plus-title">How Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Viewed the 1993 Oslo Accords — A Collection in His Own Words</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

How Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Viewed the 1993 Oslo Accords — A Collection in His Own WordsCIE+

In September 2023, thirty years after the historic signing of the Oslo Accords, there is occasion to review Prime Minister Rabin’s understanding of them. I assembled this collection years ago from Daily Reports- Near East and South Asia, 1993-1995. Two short items about Rabin’s views are also found or linked here. Rabin provided a summary of his views of the Accords in a Knesset speech in October 5, 1995. Some of Rabin’s reasons for signing the Accords are also provided in Yehuda Avner’s The Prime Ministers.

Documents and Sources, Ken's Blog|September 1993-November 1995
<span class="cie-plus-title">“The Intifada and the Uprisings of 1936-1939: A Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities”</span><span class="cie-plus-badge">CIE+</span>

“The Intifada and the Uprisings of 1936-1939: A Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities”CIE+

Comparing the 1936-39 Arab uprising in various parts of western Palestine and the intifada that began in 1987 in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, the most striking conclusion is the large number of general similarities between these manifestations of Palestinian national consciousness. The two most significant differences, however, are that the 1987 intifada generated a deeper and more prolonged Palestinian national coherence across all classes than did its predecessor and clarified and crystallized Palestinian opinion, which helped create a historic compromise in Palestinian public policy.